This post is the second half of a piece we published last week, Basic Services for All: Whose Responsibility is it Anyway?
Last week, I wrote about the provision of basic services for all, and posed the question, whose responsibility is it? To paraphrase: When the government can’t provide, should we let someone else step in? And, in so doing, do we send the message that it’s okay for government to fail?
The conclusion last week led us to look to social enterprise as the most viable alternative to government service provision, because the private sector tends to serve the wealthy, not the poor, and the non-profit sector may not be a sustainable solution. But, the question persists: by providing an alternative, are we giving government an out, so to speak?
One commenter, Anoj Viswanathan (check out his socent Milaap), believes that we don’t have the luxury of contemplating who should do the work. “While creating a systemic change is indeed required, the question one has to ask is – do I lobby/wait for a grant/subsidy that may/may not come my way, while another generation would have slipped into the grinding cycle of poverty?,” he said.
Viswanathan brings up a great point: having a theoretical debate doesn’t help the people who need education or healthcare now. But, taking a big picture approach can help us bring change to the masses, instead of just a single target group, and make sure that we’re not sending the government the message that it’s okay to fail. » Continue reading “Education for All? Invite Government to the Table”